How Europe Funds Deep Tech: Grant Plus Equity
The EIC Accelerator can combine a project grant with an equity or quasi-equity investment, but the two components follow different decisions.
Health & Evidence Library
How access, payment, geography, language, disability, public policy, and system design shape health and care.
69 guides · Page 1 of 2
The EIC Accelerator can combine a project grant with an equity or quasi-equity investment, but the two components follow different decisions.
Early HTA tests the potential value of a health innovation while its design, evidence plan, and investment choices can still change.
Section 1557 makes covered health entities responsible for identifying and mitigating discrimination risk in patient care decision-support tools.
Orphan designation creates development incentives for rare-disease products. It is not approval, proof of effectiveness, or automatic exclusivity.
ICH E6(R3) modernized GCP through quality by design, proportionality, clearer accountability, data governance, and support for varied trial designs.
Health technology assessment combines clinical, economic, ethical, social, and organizational evidence to inform transparent health-system decisions.
Good Clinical Practice protects participants and result reliability through ethics, consent, quality by design, oversight, data integrity, and transparency.
An EU joint clinical assessment analyzes relative clinical effects for national HTA. It does not decide price, reimbursement, or overall added value.
Revenue raising, pooling, and purchasing determine who pays, how financial risk is shared, and which services providers deliver.
A current, practical comparison of GDPR, HIPAA, the FTC Health Breach Notification Rule, and state consumer-health privacy laws.
External reference pricing benchmarks a medicine against prices in other countries. Its result depends on the basket, price data, formula, and review rules.
How human factors work identifies critical tasks, improves interfaces, validates realistic use, and links use-related risk to FDA submissions.
Why a successful pilot is evidence of feasibility, not proof that an intervention will retain its effect, cost, or equity at scale.
How device studies adapt good clinical practice to intended use, users, procedures, configurations, deficiencies, comparators, and design changes.
A practical EU MDR guide to technical, biological, and clinical equivalence, data access, evidence gaps, and notified-body review.
FDA drug-development meetings reduce uncertainty through precise questions, complete evidence packages, and controlled follow-through.
A medicine regulatory submission connects administrative, quality, nonclinical, clinical, labeling, and electronic evidence into a reviewable lifecycle.
An EU clinical-trial lay summary must identify the trial, explain its design and participants, and report benefits, harms, results, and follow-up clearly.
A notified body assesses whether certain medical devices meet EU conformity requirements. Learn its powers, limits, and role after certification.
A practical guide to the European Union's in vitro diagnostic regulation, including risk classes, evidence, notified bodies, and lifecycle duties.
The FDA De Novo pathway classifies certain novel medical devices as class I or II when no suitable predicate exists and controls can manage the risks.
Prevention can improve health without saving money. Value depends on effectiveness, costs, time horizon, baseline risk, and who pays.
A plain-language guide to 45 CFR 46, human-subject research, IRB review, consent, exemptions, expedited review, and single-IRB reliance.
Launch is the start of medical-device software oversight. Learn how monitoring, complaints, incidents, updates, and change control fit together.
How housing, food, income, education, transportation, environment, and social context shape health and health care.
Learn how valid clinical association, analytical validation, and clinical validation support a Software as a Medical Device claim.
How EU risk management plans connect safety concerns, pharmacovigilance, routine controls, additional measures, and effectiveness evaluation.
How ISO 14971 and IEC 62304 connect hazards, requirements, software life-cycle controls, testing, cybersecurity, and postmarket learning.
Start medical software with the intended use, claim, hazards, and evidence plan. A regulatory-first workflow turns obligations into testable specifications.
What spontaneous safety reports and disproportionality analyses can show, why they cannot estimate risk, and how FDA investigates a signal.
Understand how a PBRER integrates interval and cumulative safety, use, signals, benefits, uncertainties, and actions without delaying urgent reporting.
A neutral guide to how health care is delivered, financed, coordinated, and regulated, and how a patient actually gets through it.
Real-world evidence can support product decisions when data are relevant, reliable, and analyzed for a prespecified regulatory question.
How personal and organizational health literacy shape understanding, decisions, getting through the system, safety, and health outcomes.
The 510(k) pathway compares a device with a legally marketed predicate. Learn what substantial equivalence does and does not establish.
How an IVD intended purpose becomes a traceable evidence plan spanning scientific validity, analytical performance, and clinical performance.
A cost per QALY threshold measures health displaced elsewhere in a fixed budget, not a price for health. How NICE applies its range and why it is contested.
A plain explainer of FDA's January 2026 updates to its clinical decision support and general wellness guidance, and what now sits under enforcement discretion.
How delinked subscription payment works for antibiotics, why the UK adopted it, and the market incentive it is built to correct.
A plain explainer of the EU AI Act risk tiers, why most medical AI is high-risk, the core obligations that follow, and the phased timeline.
The 2026 Digital Omnibus reset EU AI Act deadlines to December 2027 for Annex III systems and August 2028 for AI in regulated products.
How FDA accelerated approval trades a surrogate endpoint for a required confirmatory trial, and how the 2022 FDORA reforms tightened that bargain.
How a device reaches market by matching a predicate, what substantial equivalence really proves, and why software strains the logic.
How outcomes-based, annuity, and warranty agreements let payers cover one-time gene therapies despite uncertain long-term durability
How the 2025 IMDRF N88 document moves FDA, EU, and other regulators toward shared expectations for AI-enabled medical devices.
How managed entry agreements let payers cover costly new drugs before the evidence is settled, and why outcomes-based deals are so hard to monitor.
An independent WHO committee meets every two years and weighs effectiveness, safety, and comparative cost to choose essential medicines.
The WHO framework sorts digital health tools by whom they serve. Here is how it works and why a common language helps evaluate technology.
How severity modifiers and QALY shortfall (absolute vs proportional) reset the effective price a health system pays for a treatment
Regulators weigh clinical evidence on quality, directness, and totality, then set a higher bar where the intended use and potential harm demand it.
A plain guide to how regulators and manufacturers keep monitoring a medical device after approval, from incident reports to periodic safety updates.
How the FDA substantial-evidence standard works, from the two-trial default and FDAMA 115 to the 2026 one-trial-plus-confirmatory-evidence shift
How ICER combines an evidence-rating matrix with cost-effectiveness modeling to judge a drug's value, and what the method can and cannot settle.
How diagnosis-related groups pay hospitals a fixed price per case, the incentives that creates, and why several countries are now rebalancing them.
How evidence travels from studies to guidelines to health policy, and why strong evidence does not automatically make sound policy.
How clinical guidelines are made: who sits on the panel, how evidence is graded, how conflicts are handled, and why the advice keeps changing.
A plain-language guide to how ACOs use spending benchmarks, shared savings, and downside risk, and why the benchmark math decides whether the model works.
How a QALY combines a utility weight and time, and the documented limits of what this single cost-effectiveness number can capture
How FDA Expanded Access and the federal Right to Try pathway differ in oversight, and why neither one proves a drug is safe, effective, or even obtainable
A plain guide to EU MDR, IVDR, and Software as a Medical Device: what counts as a device, how software is classified, and why the rules build clinical trust.